warinner ([info]warinner) wrote,
@ 2008-03-12 12:21:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
On Spin
I reread "Me First" blog and I'm not happy with it. It didn't convey how pissed off I am with Clinton's tactics over the last few weeks.

The Clinton campaign has resorted to trash talk: the VP chatter, the 3 am phone call, the attacks on Obama's 'inexperience,' the claims of momentum. I'd like to believe that the trash talk does not work but a close reading of the exit polls in Ohio and Texas seems to show it did, so the Clintons will be stick with it.

Unfortunately, the inexperience attacks have worked. Obama has to respond effectively. Those 'inexperience' arguments can easily be turned around on Clinton and supplemented with counter-charges about judgment.

I happen to think that Obama has run a better campaign, not in the media spin sense, but being better organized on ground, better prepared for a long campaign and has more or less matched his public message to it. Clinton, however, has relentlessly played the expectations game and spun each demographic twist but her campaign has made some fundamental misjudgements. They were surprised by Iowa, they miscalculated South Carolina and they thought Super Tuesday would be the end. All the Clinton spin feels like "hey batter, batter, batter" chatter rather electoral fundamentals.



(Post a new comment)


[info]chi_editrix
2008-03-12 06:14 pm UTC (link)
Although I agree with every word of your analysis, I must protest this tendency to talk about the two contenders as "Obama" and "the Clintons." While it's true that the spouses of both candidates have stumped for them and have a high profile, let's just call the Clinton campaign her campaign. I see you only did it once, whereas Maureen Dowd does it all the time, but still.

(Reply to this)


[info]crimsonsamurai
2008-03-12 10:35 pm UTC (link)
Unfortunately, the inexperience attacks have worked. Obama has to respond effectively. Those 'inexperience' arguments can easily be turned around on Clinton and supplemented with counter-charges about judgment.

Not only that but I've known tons of voters who are voting for Obama for that exact reason, that he doesn't have the experience or willingness to play along with the lobbyists and political power brokers and act as shady and corrosive to the politically faithful of the democratic process. As much as I disdain the platform being that of only 'Change' I still take it to heart for what it is and that being something refreshingly new introduced to the original stubborningly brash set of families currently ruling the aristocratic oligarchy of political leadership and oversight in this country for the last few decades.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…